I found that the Wimba archive had a lot of redundant information that we had already reviewed in the intro videos we were supposed to have watched before the session for week one. There was some new helpful information and questions asked by other students in the course to help make some clarifications. I did however, hear some helpful information on our Literature Review, which I had already turned in prior to the Wimba session that does worry me a bit. I did not put the extra "return" between each paragraph. I only put it between each subsection per the checklist. I also did not know to not put the page break between the literature review and the references, so I am worried about that as well. Apparently I will need to make a few more adjustments to it before it is web ready. I did email Jason though after watching the archive to see what I should do.
I did appreciate how in depth the discussion went into the AR project from the literature review, to the website, and on to the abstract itself. It does allow us the opportunity to begin letting the wheels turn on what is coming up so that we are better prepared. It was good to know that we shouldn't copy and paste our learning domains into the cycles from the ADDIE process. I did that during my cycle one and will have to go back to correct it. I will as well have to go back and move my data to the bottom of the prompts per the Wimba discussion, so this has given me some helpful information.
I can honestly say that I am a bit nervous about the publishing/leadership project. I would rather do a presentation, but I find that I am still not very comfortable with speaking in front of others. I am still tossing the idea back and forth with myself, but I do see the benefit and purpose of this project. This session was helpful though in that I did learn quite a bit about this leadership project so that I can be better prepared. I look forward to making my blog post now discussing which of these I will choose.
No comments:
Post a Comment